Under the 1949 Wireless Telegraphy Act it is illegal to listen to air traffic radio communication in the UK on a scanning receiver which can be bought in any High Street. It is not illegal to OWN an airband radio, you just can't use it ! The law permits the listening to broadcasts that are intended for "general reception" only, including amateur, CB and public broadcast radio. The listening to air traffic communication is not, and never has been, a security issue to the UK and we are the only country that does not allow the rebroadcast or even discussion of such transmissions. In today's multimedia world, this is something that needs to change.

Why the contribution is important

Millions of people every day use airband radios unaware they are breaking the law. More importantly, millions more people every day now listen to live streaming of air traffic radio around the world via the Internet, from every country - except the UK, thanks to the antiquated 1949 Act. With London Heathrow the busiest international airport in the world, UK airspace one of the most crowded and the UK at one end of the world's busiest air corridor (the North Atlantic), it is unacceptable that the Act prevents the enjoyment of listening to British air traffic communication to millions around the world. The UK has one of the most in-demand airspaces in the world for global air traffic enthusiasts to listen to, but remains the only one for which it is not possible. The Wireless Telegraphy Act 1949 needs to be repealed.

Current tags

Current rating

4.875
Average score : 4.8
Based on : 48 votes
Paul
Posted by Paul July 01, 2010 at 11:35
Listening into ATC is hugely important for trainee pilots. It seems to be a completely unnecessary law.

Please login to flag this comment as inappropriate

Cooper23
Posted by Cooper23 July 01, 2010 at 11:47
It says something when there are many sites on the internet where I can listen to ATC transmissions recorded in supposedly security paranoid America, yet technically whenever I turn on my own airband radio I am breaking the law.

Please login to flag this comment as inappropriate

patriot1
Posted by patriot1 July 02, 2010 at 21:38
Yes i totally agree its high time this silly law was repealed.

Please login to flag this comment as inappropriate

ddouglas
Posted by ddouglas July 02, 2010 at 23:00
a meaningless law,from devon to the shetlands scanners are being used to listen to air traffic and as far as i,m aware no harm has come of it to anyone, the date of this law 1949 has passed into history.if the uk promotes it self as forward thinking country, this law is long over due to be changed

Please login to flag this comment as inappropriate

Parminder27
Posted by Parminder27 July 03, 2010 at 15:40
This seems to be a totally unnecessary, old law that needs to be changed! There is nothing wrong with listening to ATC feeds.

Please login to flag this comment as inappropriate

simonwien
Posted by simonwien July 03, 2010 at 15:59
When I was Heathrow during the BA strike even ITN wanted to listen to the scanner to hear info wonder if they knew it was against the law. As long as your not interfering with radio transmissions what's the harm in it? Repeal it please.

Please login to flag this comment as inappropriate

Melrob
Posted by Melrob July 04, 2010 at 07:59
This is a law with no useful meaning or merit, most of the world has unrestricted access to radio transmissions of this kind and so should the UK. Many people have and use scanners ... de-criminalize this activity!

Please login to flag this comment as inappropriate

ect76
Posted by ect76 July 04, 2010 at 14:29
The act should be repealed. The police turn a blind eye to scanner use by enthusiasts, and no-one has ever been prosecuted under the Wireless Telegraphy Act. As already mentioned, the ability to listen to ATC comms can be a valuable resource for student pilots and air traffic controllers, not to mention a source of great entertainment for airband enthusiasts around the world. Please consider repealing the act.

Please login to flag this comment as inappropriate

Glom
Posted by Glom July 06, 2010 at 12:02
A good one for the chop. Since there is nothing technically challenging about listening in, banning it isn't going to do much to stop anyone will malicious intent.

Please login to flag this comment as inappropriate

Glom
Posted by Glom July 06, 2010 at 12:15
A good one for the chop. Since there is nothing technically challenging about listening in, banning it isn't going to do much to stop anyone will malicious intent.

Please login to flag this comment as inappropriate

andrewshields
Posted by andrewshields July 06, 2010 at 12:44
Certainly time to be repealed. I mean what harm can it do-we cant talk back and tell them what to do! How can this be banned for security reasons as we can only listen and not participate.

Please login to flag this comment as inappropriate

andrewshields
Posted by andrewshields July 06, 2010 at 12:44
Certainly time to be repealed. I mean what harm can it do-we cant talk back and tell them what to do! How can this be banned for security reasons as we can only listen and not participate.

Please login to flag this comment as inappropriate

andrewshields
Posted by andrewshields July 06, 2010 at 12:44
Certainly time to be repealed. I mean what harm can it do-we cant talk back and tell them what to do! How can this be banned for security reasons as we can only listen and not participate.

Please login to flag this comment as inappropriate

andrewshields
Posted by andrewshields July 06, 2010 at 12:44
Certainly time to be repealed. I mean what harm can it do-we cant talk back and tell them what to do! How can this be banned for security reasons as we can only listen and not participate.

Please login to flag this comment as inappropriate

andrewshields
Posted by andrewshields July 06, 2010 at 12:45
Certainly time to be repealed. I mean what harm can it do-we cant talk back and tell them what to do! How can this be banned for security reasons as we can only listen and not participate.

Please login to flag this comment as inappropriate

andrewshields
Posted by andrewshields July 06, 2010 at 12:46
sorry for the repeats but we thought it wasnt working-oops!

Please login to flag this comment as inappropriate

viking9
Posted by viking9 July 06, 2010 at 13:27
I support the repeal of this part of the act.

Please login to flag this comment as inappropriate

nortonbeak
Posted by nortonbeak July 06, 2010 at 13:57
Repealing this Act would not subject the country to additional threat.

I support the amendment.

Please login to flag this comment as inappropriate

n37077
Posted by n37077 July 06, 2010 at 14:09
What's the point in law which is widely flouted in the presence of law enforcement officers, to the detriment of no-one. Time to go!

Please login to flag this comment as inappropriate

jongwe
Posted by jongwe July 06, 2010 at 16:25
This hobby is so widely appreciate by aviation enthusiasts and if after post 9/11 it is ok in the USA to listen in why not the UK ??

Please login to flag this comment as inappropriate

jongwe
Posted by jongwe July 06, 2010 at 16:26
This hobby is so widely appreciate by aviation enthusiasts and if after post 9/11 it is ok in the USA to listen in why not the UK ??

Please login to flag this comment as inappropriate

bombayhog
Posted by bombayhog July 06, 2010 at 18:39
There's no reason for this law to stay in place, as everyone else has mentioned. Let's do away with it!

Please login to flag this comment as inappropriate

jlewisf12010
Posted by jlewisf12010 July 06, 2010 at 18:46
It is very good for young pilots and air traffic controllers to get use to all the call signs and different meanings. we should be allowed to listen to it.

Please login to flag this comment as inappropriate

jlewisf12010
Posted by jlewisf12010 July 06, 2010 at 18:47
It is very good for young pilots and air traffic controllers to get use to all the call signs and different meanings. we should be allowed to listen to it.

Please login to flag this comment as inappropriate

jlewisf12010
Posted by jlewisf12010 July 06, 2010 at 18:49
It is very good for young pilots and air traffic controllers to get use to all the call signs and different meanings. we should be allowed to listen to it.

Please login to flag this comment as inappropriate

shahaanmalik
Posted by shahaanmalik July 06, 2010 at 19:31
yes, i have been waiting for this law to be demolished for a hundred years this is fantastic and it will be very good for the growth of the already thriving aviation community in the United Kingdom. Right now i have to listen to the radio communications at JFK it would be so much better to be able to watch and listen to the planes with out being arrested.

Please login to flag this comment as inappropriate

JetstarN10123
Posted by JetstarN10123 July 06, 2010 at 20:43
Long overdue for reform. We have real dificulties with this at work and I am in ATC!

Please login to flag this comment as inappropriate

DxA
Posted by DxA July 06, 2010 at 22:25
It's time to repeal this act - it's never made sense. If it was meant to enforced then they'd have never allowed scanners to be sold openly.

Please login to flag this comment as inappropriate

Lou
Posted by Lou July 06, 2010 at 22:37
Is it not time we left the last century behind and got real,if it was such a threat to national security why does not every other country have this kind of legislation? The only other States to have these laws are socialist or ex Soviet block

Please login to flag this comment as inappropriate

fuzman
Posted by fuzman July 07, 2010 at 14:01
This act should be repealed. For the most part it is not a crime to listen to the broadcast of ATC in most parts of the world. Those that tend to listen are hobbyists that have an interest in aviation.
 

Please login to flag this comment as inappropriate

fuzman
Posted by fuzman July 07, 2010 at 14:01
This act should be repealed. For the most part it is not a crime to listen to the broadcast of ATC in most parts of the world. Those that tend to listen are hobbyists that have an interest in aviation.
 

Please login to flag this comment as inappropriate

fuzman
Posted by fuzman July 07, 2010 at 14:01
This act should be repealed. For the most part it is not a crime to listen to the broadcast of ATC in most parts of the world. Those that tend to listen are hobbyists that have an interest in aviation.
 

Please login to flag this comment as inappropriate

Flybyday
Posted by Flybyday July 07, 2010 at 17:01
I had no idea that it was an offence to listen to Aircraft radio broadcasts. I am a light aircraft pilot and use ATC frequencies on every occation I fly. There can be nothing wrong with simply listening to these broadcats, it gives millions of otherwise law abiding citizens a great deal of INNOCENT enjoyment. This is another example of an unenforceable law bringing the law into disrepute.

Please do away with this offensive offence immediately.

Please login to flag this comment as inappropriate

pure3000
Posted by pure3000 July 07, 2010 at 20:50
just make it legal

Please login to flag this comment as inappropriate

philS
Posted by philS July 08, 2010 at 06:34
Yes, it should be repealed. ATC coms are an incredibly useful resource for many many sectors, both private, commercial, and governmental.

Please login to flag this comment as inappropriate

darrenwoodward
Posted by darrenwoodward July 08, 2010 at 11:56
I support the repeal of this part of the act

Please login to flag this comment as inappropriate

TeejayRandall
Posted by TeejayRandall July 08, 2010 at 15:41
I support the repeal of this part of the act.

Please login to flag this comment as inappropriate

leeus
Posted by leeus July 09, 2010 at 12:56
I agree, this needs to be reviewed! URGENTLY!

Please login to flag this comment as inappropriate

hotplane
Posted by hotplane July 11, 2010 at 14:11
A stupid law that should be scrapped immediately.

Please login to flag this comment as inappropriate

Yachydda
Posted by Yachydda July 13, 2010 at 17:46
This law is out of its time.... in 1949 it may have been neccesary...62 years on its listened to by millions.. please repeal this Law... its no longer neccesary.

Please login to flag this comment as inappropriate

hfguardnet
Posted by hfguardnet July 14, 2010 at 00:48
I agree with yachydda, the law should be changed. It is no more a security risk listening to ATC than watching live web cams that flood the net,showing real streets and real people going about their daily business.Most airports around the world show what goes on behind the scenes and are no security threat to date.

This is typical of modern britain to hang on to old stupid laws
that the whole nation think should have gone long ago.
But wait - this new goverment is all about asking the people what laws should be abolished .... so lets see shall we.

Please login to flag this comment as inappropriate

melrob
Posted by melrob July 14, 2010 at 22:49
This law is outdated and a total waste of tax payer money. Enforcement is by bailif and a policeman, that is outrageous when there are so many other important laws to enforce. Almost every other country in the world enjoys open access to ATC radio transmissions, it is time for the UK to join the modern free world and stop wasting taxpayer time and money. Repeal this law.

Please login to flag this comment as inappropriate

blobby3
Posted by blobby3 July 27, 2010 at 01:27
No harm can come from this. Weird that I can listen on the internet to ATC in the US whenever I like but not at the airport up the road?!! Waste of everyones time enforcing this.

Please login to flag this comment as inappropriate

drumcoote
Posted by drumcoote August 11, 2010 at 14:45
Totally agree -- as a recently qualified pilot who has just obtained their RT licence, I was completely stunned at being unable to listen into local ATC in order to familiarise myself with RT terminology.

I had to resort to listening to Dutch ATC to gain any perception of the speed & tone of ATC communications. There is no mechanism (other than the written word -- hardly ideal) for a general aviation pilot to maintain their skills regarding UK ATC terminology -- this isn't safe.

The existing groundless prohibition makes the skies *less* safe for pilots and the travelling public and should be repealed immediately.

Please login to flag this comment as inappropriate

Please log in to add comments and rate ideas