by ChurchCrawler
on July 10, 2010 at 07:58PM
Abolish the "Get Set" stage of our traffic lights, leaving Red (On your marks) and Green (Go!) operative only. Amber will only light to signal the lights are changing to red.
Why the contribution is important
This increases road safety, and stops those idiots from gambling by starting to pull away at Red & Amber whilst other idiots are speeding through at solid amber from another direction.
Is this idea inappropriate? Please login to report this idea to a moderator
Current tags
Posted by
jcoles2
July 10, 2010 at 21:33
Red-and-amber is found in a few of the more civilized countries (e.g., Switzerland, but not France). It means the driver can relax during red, and get ready during red-and-amber. Keep it.
Jonathan A. Coles
Jonathan A. Coles
Posted by
Wumpus
July 10, 2010 at 22:08
It would cost quite a lot of money to re-programme every set of traffic lights in the country.
You'd need to show a clear and definite advantage in doing so, and I don't think you've done that.
Apart from anything else, I find it hard to believe that any traffic lights simultaneously show amber one way and red/amber the other. Have you actually checked that this is the case?
Those idiots you mention will run red lights just as easily as red/amber.
You'd need to show a clear and definite advantage in doing so, and I don't think you've done that.
Apart from anything else, I find it hard to believe that any traffic lights simultaneously show amber one way and red/amber the other. Have you actually checked that this is the case?
Those idiots you mention will run red lights just as easily as red/amber.
Posted by
slugabed
July 11, 2010 at 11:29
How diasappointing....from the title,I thought you were proposing to only have green lights....
Posted by
nixmith
July 11, 2010 at 21:08
When the lights are red, I put the gear to neutral and apply the handbrake.
This way I do not dazzle the driver behind me.
Dazzling the driver behind me constitutes driving without consideration for other road usrs.
If the red and amber phase were withdrawn, drivers would keep their vehicle in gear, with one foot on the clutch and one foot on the brake pedal. Not a good idea.
This way I do not dazzle the driver behind me.
Dazzling the driver behind me constitutes driving without consideration for other road usrs.
If the red and amber phase were withdrawn, drivers would keep their vehicle in gear, with one foot on the clutch and one foot on the brake pedal. Not a good idea.
Posted by
Dee_Wave
July 11, 2010 at 23:38
Red and amber allows the driver to prepare the vehicle to move - look around and assess the junction, change into gear, remove handbrake, raise the revs etc.
Please legislate for the responsible majority such as myself who find the red and amber phase useful and not for the few who may proceed unsafely at this stage.
Please legislate for the responsible majority such as myself who find the red and amber phase useful and not for the few who may proceed unsafely at this stage.
Posted by
fluffnik
July 12, 2010 at 17:39
Having just been in France where there is no red and amber before green I feel that abolishing the red and amber phase would be entirely retrograde.
Posted by
podley_wodley
July 13, 2010 at 22:13
@jcoles2 - They don't have "red and amber" in Switzerland.
Posted by
ahgvdriver
July 17, 2010 at 09:20
Why not abolish the green, except for lane control, have the light flashing amber allthe time and then to steady amber when changing to red. Then the red and amber and back to flashing amber. Simples and cut a third of emmissions and cost of running the lights and manufacturing them.
Posted by
year1
July 17, 2010 at 13:35
There has to be a pause between red and green to give approaching motorists time to slow down and stop. Your suggestion would result in more collisions.
Posted by
Mrcbarber
July 29, 2010 at 22:44
What a stupid idea. The Amber is a deliberate pause see year1's post.
Please log in to add comments and rate ideas
Please login to flag this comment as inappropriate