This Act is regularly being abused. Councils and others use covert surveillance on citizens that violates our Human Rights. This intrusion into our privacy is disproportionate to the actual risk we pose to society, it is used for instance to spy on residents to see if we are doing our rubbish properly. Nobody is checking or enforcing that this surveillance complies with RIPA. We cannot protect ourselves from this abuse because it is carried out covertly. The same holds true for MI5's indiscriminate use of phone and email interception. We can't even seek justice because we can't get the required proof, the evidence. And of course all this is carried out 'in the public interest', again it is impossible for us to prove that it is only in the government's interest, not the public's because the government decides what is 'in the public interest' when actually it is in their own interest - to retain power over us.

Why the contribution is important

Because it goes against our rights (as in the Human Rights Act) and is a huge waste of public money which could be better targeted at real criminals.

Current rating

4.85526315789
Average score : 4.8
Based on : 76 votes
joesky9
Posted by joesky9 July 01, 2010 at 12:14
It is quite disgraceful that town councils are using RIPA to cover their activities such as spying on indivdiuals to see if they are misusing their dustbins etc. Town councils should have no authority to use these tactics.

Please login to flag this comment as inappropriate

stemar
Posted by stemar July 01, 2010 at 12:15
I've no problem with using covert surveillance for serious crimes and would accept that there's a case for using it for persistant offenders in less serious cases, but no surveillance should ever be legal without a court order, which needs to be more than just a rubber stamp.

Please login to flag this comment as inappropriate

anthonyfroberts
Posted by anthonyfroberts July 01, 2010 at 12:17
An appalling misuse of power by councils. Down this route a police state lies.

Please login to flag this comment as inappropriate

weasley
Posted by weasley July 01, 2010 at 12:56
Just more proof that we are already living in a police state subject to observation in every aspect of our lives.

All cctv activity should be reduced by at least 90%. We have over 8 million cctv cameras in this country - more than all the other european countries put together. This should be unacceptable in a civilised country.

Please login to flag this comment as inappropriate

barkingmad
Posted by barkingmad July 01, 2010 at 17:01
I would like to see local councils return to the idea that they are the SERVANTS of their electorate and not their MASTERS

Please login to flag this comment as inappropriate

oscott
Posted by oscott July 01, 2010 at 18:28
Support!

Please login to flag this comment as inappropriate

fenman
Posted by fenman July 01, 2010 at 18:45
The Act should only be used by police and Security Services for the Prevention of Terrorism, national Security and Serious Organised Crime

Please login to flag this comment as inappropriate

fox
Posted by fox July 01, 2010 at 19:50
The authorisation of intrusive surveillance operations has become too routine, and needs to be rolled back so that it is exclusively reserved for serious crime and terrorism.

If a case is serious enough that covert surveillance or the gathering of sensitive data is necessary, then the Police should be conducting the investigation and not a Local Authority. I see no reason therefore for Local Authority staff to be allowed to infringe upon the Article 8 ECHR rights of British citizens.

Please login to flag this comment as inappropriate

dweaver
Posted by dweaver July 01, 2010 at 22:21
Well said

Please login to flag this comment as inappropriate

Riff
Posted by Riff July 02, 2010 at 15:45
Only a properly sanctioned court order should enable surveillance to be carried out. End of!

Please login to flag this comment as inappropriate

ianm
Posted by ianm July 03, 2010 at 00:55
load of rubbish - you obviously do not understand the act

Please login to flag this comment as inappropriate

ad100789
Posted by ad100789 July 04, 2010 at 23:13
This law should be repealed forthwith.

Please login to flag this comment as inappropriate

kizzie33
Posted by kizzie33 July 05, 2010 at 19:51
nut job.....Back in your white jacket now

Please login to flag this comment as inappropriate

Please log in to add comments and rate ideas